USA: Welfare drug test bill heads to Fla. Gov. Scott

I've posted this because, for once, here's a policy that's actually fair to taxpayers! How often does that happen these days? The new measure in Florida, USA, requires all adult recipients of federal cash benefits to test for drug usage - on their own dime - in order for them to qualify for welfare. Of course, the best scenario is no welfare, but this is a start. But, there is a twist. If they pass the test, they get the drug-test money back. Fail, and they don't get welfare for a year. Fail again, and no welfare for three years. Ohhhh - what are the Democrats going to do without their peeps getting welfared? It's going to be fun to watch.

Applying for welfare benefits in Florida? Soon you’ll need to get drug tested.

A measure requiring the tests passed the Senate on Thursday and is headed to Gov. Rick Scott, who called it one of his legislative priorities.

“It’s fair to taxpayers,” Scott said after the vote. “They’re paying the bill. And they’re often drug screened for their jobs. On top of that, it’s good for families. It creates another reason why people will think again before using drugs, which as you know is just a significant issue in our state.”

Scott already signed an executive order requiring random drug testing of state workers.

HB 353 requires all adult recipients of federal cash benefits — the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program — to pay for the tests, which are typically around $35. The screen would be for all controlled substances and applicants would have to disclose any legal prescriptions.

Recipients who test positive for drugs would lose their benefits for a year. If they fail a second time, they lose the benefits for three years. Parents who test positive must designate another adult to receive benefits on behalf of their children.

Those who pass would be reimbursed by having their benefits increased by the cost of the test.

“This is an effort to stop this cycle of drug abuse,” said Sen. Steve Oelrich, R-Gainesville, one of the sponsors, who added the requirement was similar to one that many employers make of workers.

The measure provides no money for substance abuse treatment.


Source